Getting What You Want With the Help of the San Diego Divorce Lawyer

A divorce lawyer is by definition an attorney that deals with family law. San Diego divorce lawyer offices are considered to be very good because, as always, experience makes the difference between winning and loosing and they have it.

Divorce in San Diego has a long history, the first cases being filed back in the 1850?s so you can say that any San Diego divorce lawyer knows what he?s doing since this is a family business. Another thing you can say about a San Diego divorce lawyer is that he is prepared for any type of case. A mediation case, litigation or even a case that is settled outside of court - a San Diego divorce lawyer can handle it.

Another thing you can do if you don?t want to hire a San Diego divorce lawyer is fill out an online divorce form. This means that you will spare a few hundred dollars, but you won?t settle anything very complicated. You will represent yourself in court, but all the paperwork is done by other lawyers. This way you can have all the legal work done by an attorney, but you will be forced to do al the physical work. This way you can be represented by a San Diego divorce lawyer without even being from the state of California. This is a risky job because you, as a physical person, don?t know all the insides and you can be tricked easily by an experienced attorney.

This kind of trick can be pulled if you are sure that your case is going to be mediated and settled outside of court without any disputes. This usually happens when the couple doesn?t have any assets to split and, most importantly, the case doesn?t involve child custody. If a simple breakup case turns into litigation, under these circumstances, you will most certainly need a lawyer and not just any, but a good one. There is another problem with filling out an online form: the laws of the state you live in might be different than the ones of the state in which the law office that takes your case is. If we take as an example a San Diego divorce lawyer office which is known to be very good, but the client lives in New York then the advice that a San Diego divorce lawyer gives is useless because the laws are different.

Still a San Diego divorce lawyer can help you with a case in another state (even if the laws are different) if he is well prepared. It will take time for him to learn the laws, to get acquainted with the case and the problems it involves and, most importantly, to understand what the client?s plan is for the case and what he should get out of it. It is very important to develop a healthy relationship with your attorney; it can even be called a symbiosis. This is another matter in which experience makes a statement: having dealt with a lot of cases like your own, a San Diego divorce lawyer can understand the plan you have better and even improve it. A condition for a San Diego divorce lawyer is to have seen everything in his lifetime, concerning divorce cases. This way he won?t be taken by surprise by your case and will know how to deal with it in the best possible way. By the end of the case, by following these rules, you might get what you want and not give in to your ex?s demands.

A lot of jokes have been made on behalf of attorneys like ?what do you call a thousand lawyers on the bottom of the ocean? A good beginning?, but the most common thing said about lawyers is that they?re just a little inhuman. These unfunny jokes are made because a lawyer doesn?t think of the emotional side when he is in the middle of a case. This is one of the good trademarks of a San Diego divorce lawyer. Even though, as an attorney you have to understand your client, this doesn?t mean you have to take his weaknesses. A lawyer just needs all the information his client has. Emotions get in the way of obtaining what you want from your ex and for a San Diego divorce lawyer with a certain name to protect, letting a case get to him is not too good.

Lawyers have to be cold hearted to play the rough game of the law. They can even be called sharks sometimes because they attack their prey without any remorse. However, these facts are benefic to everyone: to the client because he wins the case and to the San Diego divorce lawyer because he can do his job well and have a normal life without being affected by his job.

Sharks or no sharks, the lawyers are indispensable in a case, whatever the nature. Especially if it?s a divorce case in which you can lose a lot: assets or even the company of your children. If you hire a San Diego divorce lawyer or if you fill out an online form and only get advice form a San Diego divorce lawyer, you must know that your case is in good hands. But, if you are willing to spend a little, be sure that your money and time are not spent in vain.

This article courtesy of  http://www.mentzlaw.com.
You may freely read this information.
 

Recall Information about lawyer 

* Government Statistics on Legal Verdicts and Jury Awards - $ U.S. district courts terminated approximately 512,000 civil cases during fiscal years 2002-03. Nearly 20% or 98,786 of these cases were torts in which plaintiffs claimed injury, loss, or damage from a defendant’s negligent or intentional acts. $ Of the 98,786 tort cases terminated in U.S. district courts in 2002-03, about 2% or 1,647 cases were decided by a bench or jury trial. $ An estimated 9 out of 10 tort trials involved personal injury issues C most frequently, product liability, motor vehicle (accident), marine, and medical malpractice cases. $ Juries decided about 71% of all tort cases brought to trial in U.S. district courts; judges adjudicated the remaining 29%. $ Plaintiffs won in 48% of tort trials terminated in U.S. district courts in 2002-03. Plaintiffs won less frequently in medical malpractice (37%) and product liability (34%) trials. $ Eighty-four percent of plaintiff winners received monetary damages with an estimated median award of $201,000. $ Plaintiffs won more often in bench (54%) than in jury (46%) tort trials. The estimated median damage awards were higher in jury ($244,000) than in bench ($150,000) tort trials. April 2006 - A Jury in New Jersey found last week that Vioxx significantly contributed to a 77-year-old man's heart attack awarded him $9 million in punitive damages yesterday, raising Merck & Co.'s liability in the case to $13.5 million and intensifying pressure on it to settle such lawsuits. Example of Personal Injury Case 2004 : Ford Explorer rollover-prone and roof not crash safe and worthy- CASE TYPE : Product Design Defect, Auto Truck Vehicle - SUV, Motor Vehicle – Rollover CASE : Buell-Wilson v. Ford Motor Co., San Diego Co., Calif., Super. Ct. GIC 800836 Los Angeles, Calif. JURY VERDICT: $369,000,000 (369 Millions Dolalrs 2005 - In what may be one of the biggest massive medical malpractice tort verdicts in the state of Texas, a state jury awarded $606 million - including a remarkable $ 600 million dollars in punitive damages - to the family of an 82-year-old patient who had cancer and then who died after receiving an overdose of chemotherapy drugs. 2005 - In the 9th big loss for Ford in SUV Explorer rollover cases, a Florida jury awarded $61.2 million to the parents of an 18-year-old boy who was killed in a 1997 (wrongful death & Product Defect and Product Liability Issues) Example of Personal Injury Lawyer Case 2004 : Dodge Caravan seatback collapsed on baby in a car-seat - CASE TYPE : Automobiles, Products Liability - Product Design Defect, Wrongful Death, Motor Vehicle - Rear-ender, Motor Vehicle - Passenger, Motor Vehicle - Minivan CASE : Flax v. DaimlerChrysler Corp., Davidson Co., Tenn., Cir. Ct. O2C-1288 JURY VERDICT : $105,500,000 (105 Million Dollars 2005 – Billion Dollar Verdicts - In one of 2005's largest verdicts to an individual plaintiff regarding financial fraud , a Florida jury ordered Morgan Stanley Broker Dealer to pay $1.45 billion to investor Ronald O. Perelman for defrauding him in the sale of his camping gear company - Coleman. 2005 - February, a prominent Houston law firm and a Texas bank were SMACKED and Beaten with a $65.5 million verdict in a highly complex estate planning case that involved major problems and conflicts of interest. (65 million dollar jury award) 2005 – 3 years after a jury acquitted a company in Florida of manslaughter and criminal charges, a Florida civil jury SLAMMED the outdoor advertiser with a $65 million jury award verdict for the shock and electrocution of a sixth-grade boy. Age Discrimination - In December, a Los Angeles California jury found that PrivatAir - an aviation company focusing on private airline services - wrongfully fired Captain Doyle D. Baker on the basis of his age, defaming him in the termination process and causing extreme emotional distress.

Punitive damages serve a number of important functions which—despite a few horror stories, which are themselves either apocryphal or overturned in the courts, the functions remain valid and in the public interest. Persons causing great harm—persons deliberately or with gross negligence causing great harm should not view paying damages as merely a cost of doing business, a cost that might fit neatly into a risk analysis of wrongdoing. That is what happened in the Ford Pinto case in which the cost of paying claims to victims of a known deadly hazard was deemed less than the cost to retool the assembly line, and thus the hazard was maintained knowing full well that further people—more people would be injured or killed. This is the purpose of punitive damages, to punish this kind of egregious wrongdoing, and to deter, to be a deterrent to such conduct. It is not immediately clear why a deterrent—or the necessity of the deterrent should bear any great relationship to the amount of actual damages in a given case. There is nothing wrong and indeed something highly desirable in maintaining this disincentive to wrongdoing in an appropriate relationship to the harm and the conduct of the tort-feasor. This trend has led one commentator to suggest that ''[p]unitive damages have replaced baseball as our national sport.'' Theodore B. Olson, Rule of Law: The Dangerous National Sport of Punitive Damages, Wall St. J., Oct. 5, 1994, at A17. See also Malcolm E. Wheeler, A Proposal for Further Common Law Development of the Use of Punitive Damages in Modern Products Liability Litigation, 40 Ala. L. Rev. 919, 919 (1989) (''Today, hardly a month goes by without a multimillion-dollar punitive damages verdict in a product liability case.'').